Tuesday 25 February 2014

Microsoft: Service Manager 2012 Data Warehouse High Watermark Monitor

 << Error Message >>
Service Manager 2012 Data Warehouse High Watermark Monitor
Context details:
Value of 987 is not higher than 987

 << Cause >>
Firstly, we must do agentless monitoring of all Management and Data Warehouse servers as the underlying SCOM Agent that SCSM uses for its own processes is still based on SCOM 2007 R2 (If you didn’t know, SCSM is built from a SCOM base and then heavily customised) and although compatible you don’t get all the required functionality.

Secondly, we must have a User Account specified in the Service Manager 2012 Database Account Profile, that has Read Access to the various Databases, access to a few registry keys (ie Local Admin on the Management and Data Warehouse Servers) and be a SCSM/SCSM DW Administrator.

<< Solution >>
1.  Agentless monitoring of all Management and Data Warehouse servers.
2.  Use the same account you use for the SCSM Data Access Account for the Service Manager 2012 Database Account Profile in SCOM.


Reference:
1.  Service Manager 2012 Data Warehouse High Watermark Monitor
http://blog.msvconsultancy.co.uk/2013/05/service-manager-2012-data-warehouse-high-watermark-monitor/

1 comment:

  1. Photo Watermark does exactly what the name suggests – it lets you add watermarks to photos – but the types of watermarks you can add are quite varied.
    Not only can you add custom text as a watermark (including changing the font, size and color), you can also use your signature (or any other hand-written text) as a watermark by writing on the screen.
    You can also apply stickers, a timestamp, a location, a mosaic effect, or ‘graffiti’ (which basically just lets you go wild on your images with a digital paintbrush). Whether you want to protect your photo or just log when and where it was taken, there should be a tool here to suit.
    Photo Watermark is free, but it’s quite heavy on adverts. For $0.99/£0.89 per month you can get rid of them, but unless you’re adding watermarks to a ton of images it’s probably not worth it.

    ReplyDelete